NOW:53208:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
36°
H 36° L 18°
Clear | 14MPH

Write of Passage

Maureen Connors Badding arrived in Wauwatosa 22 years ago via Buffalo and Phoenix. She's a freelance writer and habitual volunteer who enjoys book clubs, travel, entertaining and cheering for her daughter's swim team.

It's Now or Never to Fix Transit

It’s hard to get Tosans worked up about mass transit. We’re a city of mostly two-cars-in-every-garage families. We like the door-to-door convenience that personal vehicles provide. And we’re urban enough that we can walk to stores, restaurants and services when we’re feeling environmentally friendly.

If I mentioned property tax relief, would that pique your interest in mass transit?

The truth is, while we should care about mass transit for environmental, social and business reasons, the majority of suburbanites will only care when it affects their own bottom line.

The Regional Transit and Jobs Investment Act will do just that. This proposed bill would give communities the option of creating an Interim Regional Transit Authority, which removes transit funding from the county property tax rolls and moves it to a sales tax-based system. (Milwaukee is one of the last major metro regions to have property tax-based funding for transit.) 

The IRTA and funding change are beneficial for several reasons: 

1) The cost of transit will be shared by all county residents and visitors, not just homeowners.

2) The sales tax will be capped at 0.5% -- a tax, incidentally, which was approved in Milwaukee County by voter referendum in November 2008.

3) The tax may only go into affect when transit has been removed from the county budget and, in effect, your property tax bill.

4) The IRTA will facilitate integration of services and cost savings through a regional transit authority and in conjunction with the KRM (Kenosha, Racine, Milwaukee) commuter rail line, which has its own separate funding source in place.

5) The system provides adequate funding for an effective mass transit system that can link workers with employers.

That last point is crucial, because Milwaukee County’s current bus system is only a shell of its former self. Cuts to routes and service over the last several years have resulted in more than 40,000 jobs becoming inaccessible by transit. When employers think about expanding in metro Milwaukee, accessibility by their workers is a key consideration that is leaving us behind.

 

According to the TransitNOW website, a study by the UWM Institute of Public Policy on the economic impact of the KRM project reports “its construction would generate nearly 4,000 jobs and have a $560 million impact on the local economy.”

Also on the TransitNow website is a letter signed by the leaders of many of SE Wisconsin’s largest employers — including Northwestern Mutual, SC Johnson, Roundy’s, Bucyrus, AT&T, Froedtert and Johnson Controls — stating, in essence, that we have to institute the funding shift and fix our transit system now to save jobs in our region.

So while you may never ride a bus or take the commuter rail to Chicago, it’s important for our area’s economic development that the opportunity to do so is available.

To find out more about mass transit in Milwaukee, go to TransitNow.org or attend an information session at the Wauwatosa Senior Center in Hart Park’s Muellner Building at 12:30 p.m. on March 16. Other sessions are in the works, but no matter where they are, there's a pretty good chance you’ll have to drive to get there. 

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. While I find most of your posts enjoyable and easy to read, I think your position on this issue is naive and misguided. We are NOT a mass transit community, and the baloney about 4000 jobs ignores the fact that they are temporary and hugely expensive. In the long term, mass transit operates at a deficit and requires taxpayer subsidies. Why should I pay for a system I don't want, don't need, and will never use?
  2. The IRTA must die. How much more money do you want to see emptied from your wallets? We are already living in Tax Hell, the IRTA's will send us into the abyss. We need Scott Walker as Governor.
  3. The KRM is essentially being shoved down our throats by the powers that be, so this might be a good time to study some similar projects nearby. Minnesota's Northstar Commuter Rail was originally projected to cost $165 million for an 80 mile run between Minneapolis and St. Cloud. The line would run on existing tracks and use readily available cars and engines much like the KRM.
    Planning began in the mid '90s and by 1999 the projected cost had risen to $223 million. In 2002, the project got cut in half running only 40 miles (about the same length as the KRM run would be) from Minneapolis to Big Lake and yet upon completion the final cost was $317 million - double the original estimate at half the size.
    The original construction estimate of $2 million per mile had escalated to $8 million per mile.
    The operating costs are also double the original estimate at almost $17 million per year meaning that the taxpayer subsidizes 80 percent of every ticket.

    The same thing could easily happen with the KRM, as some early estimates of the the cost appear highly inaccurate and questions about subsidies still linger. I do not believe southeast Wisconsin can afford this expensive project, at least not at this time. Kenosha is linked to the Metra train in Kenosha and has been for over 100 years. It did nothing to save their downtown or create jobs within the city.
  4. Thank you RTA. Apparently, we're going to pay AGAIN for the MCTS buses that have already been purchased.
    http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/86248672.html

    Regarding the RTA sponsored train, I often hear proponents of this say that the proposed train will spur economic development at the train stops. Is it just me, or does anybody else see that this phantom ecomonic development has not shown up at the two Wisconsin stops for the Amtrak line between Chicago and Milwaukee. Has there been any development at the Amtrak stop at the Airport? The Sturtevant stop has been a virtual ghosttown for decades.

    It's too bad that Senator Sullivan doesn't agree with me on the worthlessness of this train between the downtown Amtrak station and the Dane County airport. Maybe he doesn't know that WISCONSIN TAXPAYERS will be responsible to operate this train forever! Is this really a problem in search of a solution?
  5. "Remove transit from the county budget and form an IRTA."

    In a strange and twisted way, I might be open to an IRTA, Maureen. As repugnant as an additional county tax is to me, an IRTA might, might have a chance to do things right.
    However, your portayal of the current bus system as a "shell of it's former self", and of Scott Walker of being guilty of having "dismantled" the parks and bus systems is disengenous at best. That's an overblown ad hominem to be truthful. They aren't dismantled.
  6. The big picture in my mind is not about shifting responsibility of MCTS to the IRTA since the IRTA is essentially not broke. It's not even about funding trains through this new IRTA agency. The big issue is about spending all tax money WISELY.

    Face it, no matter what government agency is running what service, the money to fund those services come from taxpayers in one way or another and that's what all aspects of government subsidized mass transit have in common. Isn't that what's really important, or does money really grow on trees?
  7. Thanks for bringing the discussion back to the point of the blog, Cheesehead. Remove transit from the county budget and form an IRTA. Please watch TransitNow.org for upcoming information sessions, everyone!
  8. "But Walker has dismantled the bus system and parks for his own selfish reasons.."

    Excuse me?! What are those big, exhaust belching green and white things carrying a couple of people each that I get stuck behind everyday? Optical illusions? And those large green wide open spaces located throughout the County, with kids and families playing and picnicing, are those not parks anymore?
    Are you telling me that buses and parks are no longer functioning because Scott Walker threw them all away? Get a grip girl.
    So the grass grows a little longer during summer and a couple of empty buses no longer pollute the air, big stinking deal. The County is BROKE. What part of that don't you understand?!
    Oh the HORROR of budget cuts....the horror.
  9. I don't deny that the bus is an effective mode of transportation in some circumstances including, but not limited to, U-BUS service to UWM, transportation to Summerfest/State Fair, possibly rushhour transportation in SOME locations, and a few other instances. What I find troubling is that when I DO see busses on the streets, it's almost a certainty that they've only got 1 or 2 passengers on them. Throwing more money indiscriminately at the bus system isn't wise since it would likely add even more nearly empty busses to the streets of Milwaukee County. Nobody has been able to show me how a train system would be any different.

    For example, is that bus that runs on Mayfair Road EVER more than half full? Ever? Whenever I see it on 108th Street, there are always less than 3 passengers on that bus, so I'm asking if anybody else knows for sure that it ever has more passengers on board at different times of the day.

    Did anybody see this story from Madison a few weeks ago? This Madison bus driver 'earned' $159,258 driving a City bus in Madison. Yeah, driving a bus!

    http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt_and_politics/article_24af32d4-13f4-11df-86b2-001cc4c002e0.html

    Dane County/City of Madison taxpayers should be proud.
  10. SOM, I didn't notice a single bus, although I did see people waiting at bus stops.
Load more comments View all comments Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement