NOW:53208:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
H 9° L 7°
Cloudy | 15MPH

Both Sides of the Fence

A Tosa resident since 1991, Christine walks the dog, cooks but avoids housework, writes and reads, and enjoys the company of friends and strangers. Her job takes her around the state, learning about people's health. A Quaker (no, they don't wear blue hats or sell oatmeal or motor oil), she has been known to stand on both sides of the political and philosophic fence at the same time, which is very uncomfortable when you think about it. She writes about pretty much whatever stops in to visit her busy mind at the moment. One reader described her as "incredibly opinionated but not judgmental." That sounds like a good thing to strive for!

How's that mockey, snarky stuff working for ya, Sarah?

Sarah Palin, mocking, disrespect

If you’re a woman and you call anything about Sarah Palin into question, be prepared for the assault. It’s always the same: “you’re jealous because she’s younger better looking successful happily married smarter yadda yadda yadda.”

And if you raise the question I raised in the headline, how’s that mockey, snarky stuff working for ya, Sarah, the answer is pretty darn well, thank you.

In her speech to the Tea Party conventioneers last night, Palin delighted the crowd by jabbing at the President and anybody else on the purported left. The jeer that will live longest in the minds of her fans? “How’s that hopey, changey stuff working for ya?” Already, you can buy the tee-shirt.

Let’s face it: we don’t listen to Palin. We react to her. The same tone and triggers that thrill her supporters annoy the ones she slams.

That’s exactly what’s intended, of course.

I’ve been struggling to understand why this energetic, attractive woman bothers me so much. Last night I figured it out. Her speeches are half popular-girl-running-for-student council-cheerleading. That part’s fine. But the other half is mocking-bully-girl-rabble-rousing.

Bottom line: it’s disrespectful. I don’t remember George Bush being disrespectful of his opponents in speeches. Strong, adversarial. But not mocking. I don’t remember Ronald Reagan, whose name Palin invoked repeatedly, being disrespectful of his opponents. Strong, adversarial. Humorous, even. But not mocking.

It’s also unfortunate. Though most of Palin’s emotionally-targeted speech was intellectually vague, she had some valid and important points to make about transparency, about the failures of the Democratic senate, about the bailouts. But those points were never developed.

And her flip and snide presentation assured that no one who really needed to hear them would.

Today in Quaker meeting (what we call our services), a man rose and spoke of being careful with our speech. Everything we say should come from a spirit of love, he said. “When we talk to one another, we are saying ‘you matter enough for me to put my love into words.’ And then the love transforms the words.”

Some things are just too important to leave up to the middle school cafeteria gang. If Sarah Palin wants to begin to fill the considerable promise that she holds, she’ll have to get a little of that strong-but-respecty-transformy thing going on. And so will the gang that eggs her on.
 

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. @SOM - David Vitter, John Ensign, Mark Sanford and all Republicans, all of whom have had ethical issues investigations becuase of the ethical misconduct have not and will not quite there jobs.

    If these conservative politicians can weather and surivive the storm of their own making, I can see no reason that Sarah Palin should be given special treatment and be allowed to get away by her supporters to "quite" only after 1 1/2 years in office. It's not much of an executive record to quite.

    She could have written the book in office, she could still be paid to speak

    If she thinks being a FOX news paid pundit, her media and propaganda wing, is going to help her in 2012 with the 70% of other Americans who are not hardcore conservatives, she is flat wrong.
  2. I admit to a simple 'copy and paste' link error to the 2nd youtube link in my previous post. Here's the one that I should have put in there. Haste makes waste.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JogP4rlrmlc
  3. TunedIn.

    Remember when Biden told some Indians, "You can't go to any 7/11 or Dunkin Donuts in Delaware without finding an Indian working there."?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIT3jUrNTX0
    Brilliant!

    Remember when Biden said that if Obama is elected, he'd be tested within 6 months and the world is going to find out that Obama has nerves of steel. Even MSNBC called it a 'gaffe' and said that Obama is not happy about that candid remark.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JogP4rlrmlc
    Brilliant!

    Remember when Biden said that even with the billions spent on Stimulus, there's still a 30% chance that Obama'll get it wrong?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCqqlYTi57A
    Brilliant! He's a prophet!

    I've changed my mind, TunedIn. You're right and I was wrong. Just like you, I might actually pay $40 to hear Biden speak 'off the record'. It might be fun. It would certainly be more entertaining than the Palin speech I saw.

    Getting back to Palin, don't think I noticed that you 'swept under the rug' my mention of the DNC's tactics to smear Palin with all those FRIVILOUS ethics violations charges. It costs money to pay her defense lawyers. That's money she didn't have until she started doing her speaking tour. How many ethics charges were filed against Palin? How many resulted in a conviction? That's a real question to y'all, not a rhetorical one. I can hear the crickets chirping while the Palin-bashers are reading this.

    Just for the record, I went to the Palin event to see if there were any crazy nutcases on EITHER side. There weren't, so I was a little bummed out about that. In fact, the orgainizers of the RTL/Palin event strongly discouraged/prohibited any form of political theatre in the crowd. I'm glad I went, but hindsight being 20/20, I probably wouldn't do it again. I'd rather spend that $80 to buy essential things like food & beer.
  4. SOM: I would pay $40 plus to see Joe Biden speak, and $100 or more to see Obama or Clinton (Bill) speak.... But, then again, I enjoy listening to people who are capable of speaking, generally, and more so impressed with those hwo are eloquently skilled in twisting words to suit their own purpose... To me, Palin is not a qualified linguistic. ( There is no fun in paying to listen to someone that even I could out-speak... But, eh, that's just me... Doncha know? )

    She ran up up the bills expecting the RNC to pay for it... she was too dumb to realize they would leave her out to dry... Not too savvy... certainly not politically savvy enough to be the V.P., but a distraction? Yes. )
  5. ...and just exactly where do you think all those 'bucks' are going, Jacob? Do you believe that the DNC was throwing the kitchen sink (figuratively speaking) at her in terms of bogus ethics charges during the campaign? The DNC knew she wasn't rich. The strategy was to pummel her with lawsuits and charges that she'd have to defend herself against (using her money) and as a result, they'd beat her into submission (again, figuratively speaking). Do you believe that the very practical result of these bogus ethics charges against Palin was to put her deeply in debt? The answer to both of those questions is 'yes'.

    Were there any ethics charges that were substantiated? I don't think there were, because if there were, the State Controlled Mainstream Media would have used this as their lead story for weeks. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
    Palin needed the money to pay off her defense lawyers. Does that make her a bad person who feels that she needs to pay her debts? I ask you and all your Palin bashing comrades to put political philosophies aside and look at the practical realities. If you were smacked with hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal fees that were incurred through no fault of your own, what would you do? Stiff the lawyers? Buy a bunch of lottery tickets? She's riding the populist wave right now and she's cashing in on it. What's wrong with that?
    I was at the Palin event at the State Fair last year. One guy in line made a very astute observation. He said, "I bet Joe Biden couldn't get a few thousand regular folks to pay $40 each to see/hear HIM speak. I certainly wouldn't, but I wonder how many of the Palin-bashers would.
  6. The way I see it is that the way Sarah Palin acts now, like a money hungry princess prima-donna that quite her governership, not even fullfilling her own term in office, is a charlatin and took the easy way out to make a buck.
  7. apples and oranges man.
  8. There is right and there is wrong, life is that simple, 'it is mostly the dishonest who like to believe that there is grey.'

    TT-

    I dunno about that.

    The color-sensing rods in our retinas require a high level of illumination to function properly.

    The retina’s cones (which can discern shapes and texture in very low light levels) are not sensitive to color.

    Objects illuminated by moonlight are too dim to activate our color vision.

    Which is why objects viewed in the light of the moon as observed in shades of grey. (I’d be willing to bet that you knew that.)

    It’s not dishonest – that is the way it is…
  9. I certainly do not trust liberals, they are mostly useful idiots of the current marxists in charge. There is right and there is wrong, life is that simple, it is mostly the dishonest who like to believe that there is grey.
  10. Danjm16, before I shovel more snow, I'll weigh in bluntly. I think we don't trust each other. The Left goes bonkers about Palin because they fear the Right is not smart or informed enough to see her limitations. And the Right believes the Left is so lacking in moral compass and will that they won't dig their heels in and do the hard work. And frankly, we both keep giving the other side ample reason to continue to believe that.

    But really, when you get down to real life, most of us are reasonable and honorable most of the time and hard working and decent enough.

    Change comes from the bottom up. So I think we need to refuse to let whoever "they" are continue to feed this distrust that divides us. And we start by respecting each other. We're having a civil discussion right now. Thank you so much for that.
Load more comments View all comments Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement