NOW:53208:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
34°
H 34° L 34°
Cloudy | 5MPH

Both Sides of the Fence

A Tosa resident since 1991, Christine walks the dog, cooks but avoids housework, writes and reads, and enjoys the company of friends and strangers. Her job takes her around the state, learning about people's health. A Quaker (no, they don't wear blue hats or sell oatmeal or motor oil), she has been known to stand on both sides of the political and philosophic fence at the same time, which is very uncomfortable when you think about it. She writes about pretty much whatever stops in to visit her busy mind at the moment. One reader described her as "incredibly opinionated but not judgmental." That sounds like a good thing to strive for!

Silly season: the over-reaction epidemic

Bud Grose, politics, kids



Forget H1N1: worry about the over-reaction epidemic.

The town of Glenrock, Wyoming, is smaller than the town my grandfather lived in. But when I visited Canton, South Dakota, as a college student, everyone knew that they didn't know me.

"Who's this young lady, Otto?" the clerk asked. "She's my granddaughter," he said, his eyes twinkling. The woman looked a little nonplussed. "Didn't know Dort had kids that old," she said.

"Naw. Not Dort's. I done it twice, you know," he said, taking my arm and the groceries. Before dinner, everyone in town knew my grandfather had been married more than once, and the proof of the pudding was in his living room. The community alert system was activated, and a contingent of the more boldly curious among them knocked at the door. They wanted to take a peek.

I bring this up because as much as times may have changed, it's hard to believe that the Glenrock police officers who tasered 76-year-old Bud Grose didn't know him pretty well when he and a 9-year-old neighbor took his 1959 John Deer tractor on a little detour during the annual Deer Creek Days parade.

It's hard to believe that two young police officers would think they'd need to escalate to using shock weapons to subdue an old man and a little boy, both members of the community.

You'd think that when they couldn't get the pair to change course, they'd figure out the situation might lead to a little traffic confusion and head off to make the best of it. And then scold Bud over the pulled pork and coleslaw later. Maybe write a little ticket, come to that. Or talk to his kids to make sure something wasn't going on with Mr. Grose.

That's how things work when people know each other and have a little common sense.

It's not so hard to believe that Mr. Grose or the boy who was driving might have more than tapped the police SUV that got in their way. Okay: let's say they might have rammed it, as the police say they did. Though I can't imagine my grandfather doing that with his favorite tractor. Still, you never know what's going to happen when folks get their testosterone up.

That's not right either, though you can imagine how satisfying it might be in a frustrated Towanda! sort of way. In my book, damage to vehicles is not as bad as damage to human beings.

Does it seem like people have lost their ability to distinguish what's a little bad from what's a lot bad? What's worth being watchful about and what demands bringing out the tasers or crowds with burning torches?

I'm thinking about the "silly season" response to President Obama's speech to school children. One BrookfieldNow commenter said:

In 20 minutes he could urge children to convince their parents we need socialized medecine. He could promote his image of volunteerism, steering students to his planned civilian national security force. He can promote redistribution of wealth. He can promote global warming/climate change. He has already seized control of banks, auto manufacturers, mortgage industry, and wants to end talk radio and control the internet. We won't know what was in the original talk to students since it is being revised thanks to vigilant parents. His job experience was a community organizer. I have no doubt he would use those skills to influence our youth to follow his lifelong socialist agenda, a little at a time.

Whew. Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill. Anyone who's ever heard presidential comments of this sort -- from any president -- knows they aren't going to go into that territory in this situation. And never would have, vigilant parents or not.

But people seem pumped into a state of exaggerated fear and over-reaction. Despite the evidence of our own lives, most of which are pretty safe, and our experiences with real people, most of whom are pretty reasonable (most of the time), we seem to start from Elevated Alert level yellow and move at any small perception of threat to High Alert orange.

We are scaring our ourselves -- and our kids -- silly.

It might be better to start from blue or green or whatever the real alert level is in Wauwatosa or Brookfield, Wisconsin. Then we might say "listen respectfully to authority figures but keep a large dose of skepticism."

Even for your parents' notions.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. Is it just me, or does anybody else find it slightly ironic that President Obama delivered a speech to school kids presumably urging them to do well in their classrooms, while at the same time, his Administration has been bailing out firms who DON'T do well in their respective businesses. You all know I'm talking about the Insurance bailouts, the GM bailouts, among many more to come (if the President gets his way).

    I haven't seen President Obama's speech yet, so I have no idea if it was inspiring or boring. Did the President say anything about the totally radical things we've recently learned about Van Jones today? Valarie Jarrett said that she absolutely loves his 'energy and enthusiasm' as Obama's Green Jobs Czar.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAQDIQmSqF8

    Hope & Change? OK...
  2. I think private school teachers can see the intelligence of being represented by a union in most situations. Have you seen the pay discrepancy. This clearly is a group that could use a union. Then guess what tuition would be,ouch ! I guess it's nice to have that private school education subsidized by the teachers who teach those private school kiddies. Unless you think 30-40k is good for a teacher with a bunch of experience under the belt I think someone is being taken advantage of. Sounds like private school teachers need a union.
  3. With regard to the union issue ........ I think what it says is that there's a correlation between being smart and recognizing that there's strength in numbers.
  4. Word for word, Stubborn, I think you are more than holding your own!
  5. I'm glad to see that all of you agree with me in that it's a good thing to let any President ((R) or (D)) talk to the kids so the kids get 15 minutes of snooze time during the day. Does anybody REALLY think that ANY 15-minute Presidential address directed at kids is going to have any significant effect? The teachers and parents have a much greater effect on how kids think and develop.

    I'm also glad that you all agree that the kids should be presented both sides of hot-button issues so they can use their own developing minds to learn how to think and make up their own minds about issues in the future.

    But then again, maybe I shouldn't really speak on your behalf as you often do on my behalf.
  6. had to comment:

    I agree, it's very odd.

    Isn't it just as odd that the more educated one is (teachers), the more likely they are to need to feel that they must be represented by a UNION (WEAC)? What exactly does that say? Aren't they smart enough to represent themselves in negotiating their own contracts?
  7. "I know darned well that a balanced discussion of the issues will never take place in the classroom simply because of this (D) bias that most public school employees have."

    1) Replace "classroom" with "church"
    2) Replace "(D)" with "(R)"
    3) Replace "public school employees" with "born-again Christians"

    To make the original statement untrue, convince more conservatives to teach for a living (altruism over money). I would welcome that . . . and not just in private schools, where they seem to prefer to teach to those who think like them (understandable, but doesn't solve the "public school teachers are so liberal" issue.
  8. Isn't it odd that the more educated one is the more likely they are to have a liberal lean. What exactly does that say ?
  9. SOM...you actually pressured your kid to wear political stuff to school ? Again I ask....with your extreme distaste for teachers because they are tainting your child's viewpoints with their left leaning ways.......why would you send your kid off to that school for even one day to be "indoctrinated" ? Seems like you should be sending your child to a private school to be indoctrinated in the way you would like.
  10. SOM, I understand your objection completely. I guess we will have to agree to disagree on its validity.
Load more comments View all comments Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement